Understanding Of Principles Of Corporate Governance For JB-Hi-Fi

Question: Discuss about the Understanding Of Principles Of Corporate Governance For JB-Hi-Fi. Answer: Introduction: The current study is engaged in the understanding of corporate governance and studying the rising importance in the last decade. A detailed understanding of principles of corporate governance for JB-Hi-Fi is examined to report on the matters of integrity in financial reporting. The report will be providing the definition of goodwill by reflecting the current requirements of reporting for firms that listed in ASX. The analysis of the JB-Hi-Fi goodwill recognized and unrecognized is performed together with the description of goodwill impairment. Additionally, the study of Intendent Auditors Report and relative analysis of audited financial statement of JB-Hi-Fi will be reflected by stating the necessary changes made by the company. Corporate governance: Corporate governance is the study of rules, regulations, process and system that act as the tool for applying authority and regulating the internal control of an organization (Panditharathna 2016). The corporate governance structure principally recognizes the distribution rights and accountabilities amid different participations in the company. Corporate governance acts as the mechanism of procedure through which the relations of the company are controlled and directed. Importance of corporate governance in last decade: During the last decade, corporate governance has become a vital aspect. The tool of corporate governance assist in understanding the rights of the shareholders and assisting them in exerting the rights. Modern conversation of corporate governance tends to refer the general principles that surrounds the business that anticipated operating is to assure appropriate governance (Lins et al. 2017). They help the shareholders in exercising the rights by efficiently communicating the information and promoting the participation of shareholders in the meetings. According to Domadenik et al. (2016) corporate governance is an important tool of directing the companies towards self-governing state, establishing own rules and enforcing laws among workers from superior to subordinate level. As put forward by McCahery et al. (2016) over the last decade there is a growing importance of corporate governance since the tool help in making corporations more responsible and avoiding the instances of adversity. An argument led by Tricker et al. (2015) states that failing companies with insolvent stakeholders are primary reason for increasing importance of strong corporate governance principles. A well-designed principles of corporate governance is equivalent to law enforcement agency of internal affairs unit that help in reducing the problems under extreme predisposition. A corporation can conduct meetings with the shareholders and debtors and external members such as suppliers, customers and community leaders to meet the requirements of effected parties. Corporate governance is of paramount vitality for corporation and it is regarded as an important part of business plan. The framework of corporate governance is important because it helps an organization in avoiding scandals of fraud and criminal offences. The growing importance of corporate governance is directed towards enhancing the organizations reputation among public as the self-governing firm that responsible and exemplary towards shareholders capital. McCahery et al. (2016) stated that the growing importance of corporate governance is due to its principles of shared values, organizational cultural practices and its employees. An organization lacking the principles of corporate governance is regarded as firm without ethics. Decisively, corporate governance assists an organization in remaining honest and trouble-free. Investigation of JB-Hi-Fi compliance with integrity of financial reporting: The corporate governance fourth principles deals with safeguarding the integrity of corporate reporting. The principles necessitate a firm to apply formal and arduous process of independently validating and safeguarding the integrity of financial reporting (Tricker et al. 2015). Upon investigating the financial statements of JB-Hi-Fi it is found that the management and executives of JB-Hi-Fi have remain dedicated at the highest standard in making sure that the business is carried functions are conducted in an ethical manner by complying with the greater standards of corporate governance. In accordance with the 3rd edition of ASX corporate governance principles and recommendations the business practices and policies of JB-Hi-Fi comply with the materiality aspects. The company has placed controls, which is designed to assure that the financial reporting integrity complies with the regulatory requirements of reporting. Evidences obtained from the financial statement of JB-Hi-Fi provides that the company during the accounting period have appropriately complied with section 286 of the Corporations Act 2001. JB-Hi-Fi financial report provides the company has maintained right interpretation of books of accounts and along with the financial position (Jbhifi.Com.Au 2018). The independent professional auditors audit the financial reports of JB-Hi-Fi on annual basis. Concept of Goodwill and ASX current reporting requirements: Goodwill is regarded as the intangible asset that arises when the purchaser acquires an existent business. Goodwill is an asset that indicates the upcoming financial benefits arises from other assets that is acquired by a company when gaining control of business that is not separately recognized. According to corporation Act 2001, there are statutory requirements for financial reporting (Chen et al. 2017). Companies conducting business in Australia are required to prepare and lodge with ASIC the financial statements at the end of the accounting year. The annual financial statements should be audited and under specific state of affairs, the corporations are exempted from financial reporting. Companies listed in the ASX are bounded by continuous disclosure requirements. Firms listed under ASX are required to report under present Australian accounting standard; To prepare the financial statement in compliance under section 286 of the Corporation Act 2001. Section 320 of the Corporation Act 2001 provides a statutory reporting requirements for organizations listed under ASX to lodge a half-yearly reports and auditors reports with the ASX as and when required (Glaum et al. 2018). Section 302 of the Corporation Act 2001 provides that a company is required to prepare the half-yearly reports. In compliance to section 292 of the corporation act 2001 a company is required to prepare the financial statement and directors report As stated under section 301 of the Corporation Act 2001, a company is required to have its financial reported audited by the financial auditor. In compliance to Section 317 of the Corporation Act 2001 provides that a company listed under ASX is required to lay down the financial document in the annual general meeting (Sherrill 2016). Investigation of JB-Hi-Fi financial report to support and illustrate the analysis: Evidences obtained from the financial statements of JB-Hi-Fi the goodwill impairment stood AUD 15.8 that was identified by the company in the statutory financial statement of 2017. During the financial year of 2017, the impaired goodwill amounting to $14.7 million and PPE stood $1 million, which was attributed to the JB-Hi-Fi cash-generating unit. Goodwill impairment is referred as the charge on asset that is incorporated in the books of accounts of the company when the value of goodwill on the financial statements goes beyond the fair value (Darrough et al. 2014). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not identified by JB-Hi-Fi. If it is noticed that the provisional variances arises from the original identification of assets and liabilities that is affecting neither the taxable income nor the accounting profit relating to initial identification of goodwill. Goodwill of JB-Hi-Fi is allocated to the cash-generating unit through impairment testing. On finding that the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is below the carrying amount of cash generating unit, the impaired amount of loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying value of goods will allocated to cash generating unit. Additionally the impairment loss related to goodwill is also identified in the profit and loss statement (Chen et al. 2014). Upon the disposal of operations of goodwill in the cash generating unit, the attributable amount of JB-Hi-Fi goodwill is included in the determination of proceeds or the losses on the upon the disposal of the procedure. The evidences obtained from the yearly financial report of JB-Hi-Fi provides that the goodwill arising from the purchase of Good Guys amounting to $701.5 million is identified and distributed to the JB-Hi-Fi Australian cash generating unit(Jbhifi.Com.Au 2018). Goodwill associated with the JB-Hi-Fi New Zealand was impaired that carried the worth of $14.7 million due to the poor performance in the financial year of 30 June 2017 into the cash generating unit. The goodwill of JB-Hi-Fi has originated from the acquisition of Good Guys continued to remain provisional during 2017 while the organization continued to finalize the value of its assets and liabilities that is acquired. Concept of Independent auditors Reports: An independent can be defined as the examination of financial accounts, commercial transactions, accounting practices and internal control of the organization (Gunin et al. 2014). An auditor are viewed as the independent accountant that are appointed by the shareholders to offer the independent view point of the financial statement and remuneration report prepared by the directors. Objective of Independent Auditors Report: The purpose of audited financial report is provide the users with the noteworthy assertion based on the information declared in the financial statement. The audit report is designed to enable the auditor in assessing the materiality factors included in the report. The objective of independent auditors report is to provide disclosure to the board of directors and shareholders. According to Hariri et al. (2015) audit is not carried on for the benefit of the firm or management but it is carried on for a person or group that are using the financial statement with the objective of making decision. The independent auditors report offers the investors and the management regarding the information relating to audit. The independent audit report provides the clarification of the purpose of audit by denoting the public corporation accounting oversight panel. As cited by Boyle et al. (2015) the purpose of audit report is to enable the readers with the sufficient amount of assurance regarding the independent viewpoint of the financial information stated in the financial statement. The auditors provide altered viewpoint on those situations where the financial statement does not provide the appropriate interpretation or agreement with the accounting standards (Douglas et al. 2015). The objective of auditors report is emphasize on the section that are vital in determining the going concern aspects of a firm. Comparative analysis of JB-Hi-Fi audit report for the accounting year of 2016 and 2017: On conducting a comparative study of JB-Hi-Fi, audit report for a financial year of 2016 and 2017 it was noticed that the audited reported consisted of balance sheet, profit and loss statement, comprehensive income statement, statement of cash flow and statement of changes in equity (Jbhifi.Com.Au 2018). Evidences obtained from the audit statement of JB-Hi-Fi comprised of relevant accounting rules together with the description of materials and units that are controlled by JB-Hi-Fi in accounting year 2016. Nevertheless, the audit report of 2017 demonstrated a change from the audit reported published in 2016. The audit report for 2016 did not contained key audit matters whereas in 2017 the audit report contained key audit matters concerning the 100% acquisition of Good Guys for cash considerations of $860 million. Further changes reflect that the accounting for the acquisition transactions represents amounts that was attributable to certain assets and liabilities that remained provisional during the year ended 30 June 2017 and was complex that required management judgement (Jbhifi.Com.Au 2018). Judgements was required in determining the fair value of acquired identifiable assets and liabilities together with the purchase considerations to separately identifiable intangible assets. The carrying value of New Zealand cash generating unit incorporates judgements regarding the future growth rate of the business. The audit report reflects that the auditors placed emphasis in the key audit matters because of the fall in financial performance of New Zealand CGU and the judgement required forecasting of future cash flow and other vital assumptions. The auditors report of 2016 reflect that there is no material misstatement whereas in the year 2017 the auditors have stated their opinion in audit report that there is a material misstatement and information presented in 2017 are materially inconsistent with the financial report and appears to be materially misstated. Conclusion: Conclusively the directors and the management of JB-Hi-Fi has demonstrated highest standard of commitment in assuring that the company has complied with the business requirement ethically with the highest corporate governance standard. The report offers that for impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each cash-generating unit of JB-Hi-Fi. Additionally, JB-Hi-Fi has identified the impairment loss associated to goodwill expressed in either profit or loss. The comprehensive analysis of the audited financial statement of JB-Hi-Fi provides an evidence that the company has complied with the guidelines of Corporation Act 2001. As a general, JB-Hi-Fi has implemented the internal control practices that are applicable to the organizations preparation of financial statement. References: "JB Hi-Fi | JB Hi-Fi - Australia's Largest Home Entertainment Retailer". 2018.Jbhifi.Com.Au. https://www.jbhifi.com.au/. Boyle, Douglas M., F. Todd DeZoort, and Dana R. Hermanson. "The effects of internal audit report type and reporting relationship on internal auditors' risk judgments."Accounting Horizons29, no. 3 (2015): 695-718. Chadegani, Arezoo Aghaei, Zakiah Muhammaddun Mohamed, and Takiah Mohd Iskandar. "The influence of individual characteristics on auditors intention to report errors."Journal of Economics, Business and Management3, no. 7 (2015): 710-714. Chen, Lucy Huajing, Jayanthi Krishnan, and Heibatollah Sami. "Goodwill impairment charges and analyst forecast properties."Accounting Horizons29, no. 1 (2014): 141-169. Chen, Wen, Pervin K. Shroff, and Ivy Zhang. "Fair value accounting: Consequences of booking market-driven goodwill impairment." (2017). Darrough, Masako N., Lale Guler, and Ping Wang. "Goodwill impairment losses and CEO compensation."Journal of Accounting, Auditing Finance 29, no. 4 (2014): 435-463. Domadenik, Polona, Janez Pranikar, and Jan Svejnar. "Political connectedness, corporate governance, and firm performance."Journal of business ethics139, no. 2 (2016): 411-428. Douglas, M. B., F. T. DeZoort, and D. R. Hermanson. "The Effects of Internal Audit Report Type and Reporting Relationship on Internal Auditors' Risk Judgments."Accounting Horizons3 (2015): 695-718. Glaum, Martin, Wayne R. Landsman, and Sven Wyrwa. "Goodwill Impairment: The Effects of Public Enforcement and Monitoring by Institutional Investors."The Accounting Review(2018). Gunin-Paracini, Henri, Bertrand Malsch, and Marie-Soleil Tremblay. "On the operational reality of auditors' independence: Lessons from the field."Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory34, no. 2 (2014): 201-236. Hariri, Hilwani, Hasnah Haron, and Chris Patel. "Factors influencing the independence of government auditors."Problems and Perspectives in Management13, no. 2 (2015): 380-388. Lins, Karl V., Henri Servaes, and Ane Tamayo. "Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis."The Journal ofFinance 72, no. 4 (2017): 1785-1824. McCahery, Joseph A., Zacharias Sautner, and Laura T. Starks. "Behind the scenes: The corporate governance preferences of institutional investors."The Journal ofFinance 71, no. 6 (2016): 2905-2932. Panditharathna, K. M. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance." (2016). Sherrill, Karen. "The Key Indicators Of Goodwill Impairment Write-Offs."Business Studies Journal(2016): 106. Tricker, RI Bob, and Robert Ian Tricker.Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.